From Hope To St. Hope

americorps_logo

The blogosphere looks into the firing of AmeriCorps inspector general Gerald Walpin.

TPM posts, here, here, here, here and here.

Ed Morrissey, here, here and here.

Michelle Malkin:

President Obama promised he would end “Washington games.” But his abrupt firing of the AmeriCorps inspector general is more of the same. The brewing scandal smells like the Beltway cronyism of the Bush years. And the apparent meddling of First Lady Michelle Obama in the matter smacks of the corruption of the Clinton years.

If Obama keeps up with this “change,” we’ll be back to the Watergate era by Christmas.

Byron York in the Washington Examiner, here, here, here and here.

John Hinderaker at Powerline:

Walpin, who by statute is supposed to be independent of White House control, ran afoul of Obama because he investigated a charity operated by former pro basketball player Kevin Johnson, a prominent Obama supporter. The non-profit, St. Hope, received an $850,000 grant from AmeriCorps. Walpin investigated what St. Hope did with the money and concluded that much of it was improperly spent, e.g. to pay recipients to wash Johnson’s car. The result of Walpin’s investigation was that St. Hope agreed to repay half the money it got from AmeriCorps. However, since St. Hope is insolvent, AmeriCorps is unlikely to get its money back. The acting U.S. Attorney in Sacramento declined to criminally prosecute anyone in connection with these events.

Apparently in retaliation for having put the heat on an Obama supporter, the President had Norman Eisen, a Special Counsel to the President, telephone Walpin and demand that he resign within an hour. Walpin, pointing out that he is not a political appointee and does not serve at the President’s pleasure, declined to do so. So Obama fired him. By statute, Obama is required to give Congress 30 days’ written notice of his intention to fire an inspector general and set forth his reasons for doing so. Obama failed to comply with that aspect of the statute, merely saying that Walpin no longer has the President’s “fullest confidence.” That would be sufficient reason to replace a political appointee, but not to fire an inspector general. The Obama administration first denied, but now admits, that the President is firing Walpin because of the St. Hope affair.

Oliver Willis

Moe Lane

As Ed Morrissey noted, believing that this was the White House’s primary motive requires that you believe that the administration’s instinctive, immediate reaction to seeing an employee come down with a debilitating disease is to fire them.  Yes.  That is precisely the thing that one does when one wishes to maintain a reputation for empathy and tolerance.  I can’t say that I have as much difficulty as Michelle Malkin reconciling the allegation of Walpin’s mental diminished capacity with his public appearances (see the video above), mostly because neither I nor Ms. Malkin can take it at all seriously…

UPDATE: John Hinderaker, linking to Greg Sargent

Benjamin Sarlin in the Daily Beast

Mark Hemingway at The Corner

UPDATE #2: Joe Conason in Salon

UPDATE #3: Andy McCarthy at The Corner

UPDATE #4: Zachary Roth in TPM

Ed Morrissey

UPDATE #5: Michelle Malkin, linking to Robert Stacy McCain

UPDATE #6: Ed Morrissey

Jake Tapper at ABC

UPDATE #7: Byron York at Washington Examiner

UPDATE #8: More York

UPDATE #9: Washington Times

UPDATE #10: Washington Times

Robert Stacy McCain

UPDATE #11: Josh Gerstein at Politico

Byron York at Washington Examiner

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Political Figures

2 responses to “From Hope To St. Hope

  1. Pingback: What We’ve Built Today « Around The Sphere

  2. Pingback: What We’ve Built This Weekend « Around The Sphere

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s